What a workflow diagnostic report actually looks like.
Three intentionally constructed inquiry-to-quote examples were compared offline: one match, two mismatches and five typed field differences. The aim is to show the shape and limitations of a bounded expected-vs-actual review—not to claim a live customer defect.
三个专门构造的虚构询盘场景，离线比较预期值与观察值：1项一致、2项不一致、5处字段差异。此页面展示诊断报告格式及局限，**不是已完成的客户付费项目**。
Scenario results · 场景比较结果
| Scenario / 场景 | Supplied priority | Result | Field differences |
|---|---|---|---|
happy_quote | medium | MATCH | 0 |
duplicate_inquiry | high | MISMATCH | 3 |
missing_field | high | MISMATCH | 2 |
What was different? · 差异详情
| Case | Field path | Difference classification |
|---|---|---|
| Duplicate inquiry | result.event.accepted | value_mismatch (boolean) |
| Duplicate inquiry | result.event.reason | value_mismatch (string) |
| Duplicate inquiry | result.status | value_mismatch (integer) |
| Missing field | result.error.code | type_mismatch (expected string, observed null) |
| Missing field | result.status | value_mismatch (integer) |
Raw input values are not present in the report. All differences were deliberate test fixtures; none establishes a defect in a real organization’s workflow.
Method, evidence & limitations · 方法与验证边界
What was tested
A local Python 3.13.5 run on 24 October 2026 completed 26 regression tests for the isolated comparison utility. Checks cover missing/extra fields, duplicate JSON keys and case IDs, typed comparisons, exact decimal numbers and exceptional encodings or invalid inputs. A separate run recreated this exact 3-case report.
What was not tested
No real workflow, n8n instance, third-party account, production API, customer data, user consent, payment, integration or deployed service acceptance. This is a synthetic comparison demonstration—not an independent audit, official certification or paid client reference.
Reproducibility anchor for local candidate: diagnose.py SHA-256 12595bf46a8d269a77f7d87db5dd788e0e28d3c98d6c8f056206b34a68fcce8a. This file hash documents a local artifact, not a public source release.
How the proposed paid review differs · 真实诊断怎么做
- Agree in writing on one workflow path, up to three cases, maximum three working hours, payment and acceptance criteria.
- Use fictional or appropriately sanitized and authorized observations; no customer secrets or real accounts required.
- Identify mismatches, their uncertainty and reproduction steps, if an authorized test environment exists within the agreed scope.
- Deliver a concise findings report plus an acceptance checklist; quote separately for fixes or deployment.
建议试单价为119美元，只覆盖书面约定的小范围诊断；不得视为保证修复、系统正式激活或自动付款。
Ask about a scoped diagnostic
A prospective client can ask a non-confidential question in the public GitHub enquiry thread (GitHub sign-in required). Comments are public. Never post customer names, private email addresses, phone numbers, access tokens, contracts, protected documents or live customer data.
咨询前请勿公开任何客户机密。留言须登录 GitHub，公开询价并不产生合同或付款义务。
Open non-confidential enquiry ↗ View US$119 service scope